A reference is not inventory
Pieces on the site express an aesthetic and sourcing direction. Actual availability is confirmed separately.
INGU creates a clear path from a single image or description to a specific proposal. The public edit helps communicate direction, but it never replaces verification of a real option.
“The service is not built around the illusion of instant stock. First comes a precise brief. Then come verifiable conditions. Only then does the client decide.”
Pieces on the site express an aesthetic and sourcing direction. Actual availability is confirmed separately.
Condition, exact source, price structure, delivery and timing guidance should be clear before purchase.
Technology may accelerate request analysis, but final review and communication require human judgement.
A brief and a proposal are not automatic orders. Nothing continues without the client’s explicit confirmation.
The client shows the piece and records the important parameters: size, colour, budget, condition and acceptable alternatives.
Real sources and options that fit the brief are reviewed.
Available information and the final condition structure are gathered for a specific option.
The client reviews the proposal and decides whether the purchase should continue.
The catalogue, saved references and private briefs work in the browser. Briefs are currently stored locally and are not sent to an operator automatically; after creation they can be shared through the phone’s system menu or copied.
Catalogue data is used as sourcing reference material, not as a promise of live stock.
Final price and timing are not confirmed without checking a specific source.
Local briefs may disappear when browser data is cleared.
A photo, link or short description is enough to prepare the first working brief.